Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michalski v. Colvin, 3:15-cv-4483-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160609a51 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2016
Summary: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and PROPOS ED ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to N.D.C.A Civil Local Rule 6, Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves this Court for an enlargement of time of 30 days, up to and including July 9, 2016 in which to file Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. On June 5, 2016, the undersigned counsel emailed with both Mr. Rodriguez, SSA Assistan
More

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to N.D.C.A Civil Local Rule 6, Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves this Court for an enlargement of time of 30 days, up to and including July 9, 2016 in which to file Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. On June 5, 2016, the undersigned counsel emailed with both Mr. Rodriguez, SSA Assistant Regional Counsel and also Mr. Win, who is the Supervising SSA Attorney, and requested a stipulation agreeing to extend Plaintiff's time for filing his Motion for Summary Judgment by 30 days from June 9, 2016 to July 9, 2016; Mr. Rodriguez and Mr. Win said that Defendant would not oppose Plaintiff's motion to extend time.

This extension is necessary to provide further opportunity for review and analysis of this case, as undersigned counsel was not the original attorney on the case and is in the process of exploring the possibility of Request for Voluntary Remand in order to avoid further litigation in this case. Plaintiff does not believe that Defendant will be prejudiced by his delay. This is further evidenced by the Defendant's declining to oppose this Motion. This is Plaintiff's second request for an extension.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the facts recited above and true and correct. Executed this seventh day of June 2016 in San Francisco, CA.

IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have an additional 30 days in which to file his motion for summary judgment, up to and including JULY 9, 2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer