Crawford-Harris v. Garay, 17-cv-01111-CW. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180206a55
Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 36 CLAUDIA WILKEN , District Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the for
Summary: CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 36 CLAUDIA WILKEN , District Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the fore..
More
CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 36
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. The further case management conference, pre-trial conference and jury trial dates are vacated.
Source: Leagle
