Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Agans v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 3:17-cv-06759-WHO. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180207882 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES WHEREAS Plaintiffs Steven Agans and Audrey Diaz Sanchez (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed the complaint in the above-captioned action against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant") on November 22, 2017 ("Complaint"); WHEREAS Defendant required an additional thirty days to res
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES

WHEREAS Plaintiffs Steven Agans and Audrey Diaz Sanchez (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed the complaint in the above-captioned action against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant") on November 22, 2017 ("Complaint");

WHEREAS Defendant required an additional thirty days to respond to the Complaint, to which Plaintiffs agreed, as a courtesy, and stipulated to continue Defendant's responsive pleading deadline from December 26, 2017 to January 25, 2018 (Dkt. 16);

WHEREAS Defendant filed motions to dismiss (Dkt. 26) and to compel arbitration (Dkt. 27) (collectively, "Defendants' Motions") on January 25, 2018, which are both noticed to be heard on March 14, 2018;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a motion to stay this action pending their motion to consolidate and transfer this action with now fifteen other actions before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, which is noticed to be heard on March 7, 2018 (Dkt. 30);

WHEREAS Plaintiffs require additional time to prepare oppositions to Defendants' Motions in light of the time and resources needed to oppose two motions at once and Plaintiffs' counsel's briefing deadlines in other matters; and

WHEREAS Defendant has agreed that Plaintiffs may, as a courtesy, have an additional thirteen days to respond to Defendants' Motions, extending Plaintiffs' deadline from February 8, 2018 to February 21, 2018 and Defendant's reply deadline from February 15, 2018 to February 28, 2018, while maintaining the current hearing date of Defendants' Motions on March 14, 2018.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order that:

1. Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to Defendants' Motions be continued from February 8, 2018 to February 21, 2018;

2. Defendant's deadline to reply to Plaintiffs' responses to Defendants' Motions be continued from February 15, 2018 to February 28, 2018.

ATTESTATION OF FILER

I, Tina Wolfson, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. See Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3).

Dated: February 5, 2018 By: /s/Tina Wolfson ________________ Tina Wolfson

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer