WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
WHEREAS Plaintiffs Steven Agans and Audrey Diaz Sanchez (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed the complaint in the above-captioned action against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant") on November 22, 2017 ("Complaint");
WHEREAS Defendant required an additional thirty days to respond to the Complaint, to which Plaintiffs agreed, as a courtesy, and stipulated to continue Defendant's responsive pleading deadline from December 26, 2017 to January 25, 2018 (Dkt. 16);
WHEREAS Defendant filed motions to dismiss (Dkt. 26) and to compel arbitration (Dkt. 27) (collectively, "Defendants' Motions") on January 25, 2018, which are both noticed to be heard on March 14, 2018;
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a motion to stay this action pending their motion to consolidate and transfer this action with now fifteen other actions before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, which is noticed to be heard on March 7, 2018 (Dkt. 30);
WHEREAS Plaintiffs require additional time to prepare oppositions to Defendants' Motions in light of the time and resources needed to oppose two motions at once and Plaintiffs' counsel's briefing deadlines in other matters; and
WHEREAS Defendant has agreed that Plaintiffs may, as a courtesy, have an additional thirteen days to respond to Defendants' Motions, extending Plaintiffs' deadline from February 8, 2018 to February 21, 2018 and Defendant's reply deadline from February 15, 2018 to February 28, 2018, while maintaining the current hearing date of Defendants' Motions on March 14, 2018.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order that:
1. Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to Defendants' Motions be continued from February 8, 2018 to February 21, 2018;
2. Defendant's deadline to reply to Plaintiffs' responses to Defendants' Motions be continued from February 15, 2018 to February 28, 2018.
I, Tina Wolfson, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. See Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3).
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.