Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IPVX Patent Holdings, Inc. v. 8x8, Inc., 4:13-cv-01707-SBA. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140520769 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 19, 2014
Latest Update: May 19, 2014
Summary: [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER (THROUGH MARKMAN HEARING) SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Plaintiff IPVX Patent Holdings, Inc. ("IPVX") and Defendant 8x8, Inc. ("8x8") hereby submit this [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER (THROUGH MARKMAN HEARING) pursuant to the Case Management Conference held before the Court on May 8, 2014 (Dkt. No. 103). Task Proposed Date Disclosure by Plaintiff of "Asserted Claims May 20, 2014 and Infringement Contentions" Dis
More

[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER (THROUGH MARKMAN HEARING)

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

Plaintiff IPVX Patent Holdings, Inc. ("IPVX") and Defendant 8x8, Inc. ("8x8") hereby submit this [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER (THROUGH MARKMAN HEARING) pursuant to the Case Management Conference held before the Court on May 8, 2014 (Dkt. No. 103).

Task Proposed Date Disclosure by Plaintiff of "Asserted Claims May 20, 2014 and Infringement Contentions" Disclosure by Defendant of Initial July 3, 2014 Invalidity Contentions Exchange of List of Claim Terms Believed July 18, 2014 to Require Construction Exchange of Preliminary Claim August 1, 2014 Construction and Extrinsic Evidence Case Referred to Magistrate Judge for August 6, 2014 Settlement Conference by this Date (90 Days from Referral Date [May 8, 2014]) Joint Claim Construction & Prehearing September 9, 2014 Statement Completion of Claim Construction October 9, 2014 Discovery Opening Brief on Claim Construction October 24, 2014 Responsive Brief on Claim Construction November 7, 2014 Reply Brief on Claim Construction November 14, 2014 Each Party to Submit to the Court Two (2) January 16, 2015 Binders of Markman Hearing PowerPoint Presentation/Slides Claim Construction Hearing (3 Hours) January 21, 2015, 10:00 a.m.

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

The above [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER (THROUGH MARKMAN HEARING) is approved as the Case Management Order for this case, through the Markman Hearing, and all parties shall comply with its provisions. [In addition, the Court makes the further orders stated below:]

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer