DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY v. CAMBRON, C 12-01901 SI. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20120601f58
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 30, 2012
Latest Update: May 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REMANDING CASE SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. On May 15, 2012, this case was reassigned to the undersigned judge. On May 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge Laporte issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court DENY plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) for failure to provide necessary information regarding his finances and GRANT defendant's motion to remand fo
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REMANDING CASE SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. On May 15, 2012, this case was reassigned to the undersigned judge. On May 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge Laporte issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court DENY plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) for failure to provide necessary information regarding his finances and GRANT defendant's motion to remand for..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REMANDING CASE
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On May 15, 2012, this case was reassigned to the undersigned judge. On May 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge Laporte issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court DENY plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) for failure to provide necessary information regarding his finances and GRANT defendant's motion to remand for untimely removal and lack of jurisdiction. No party has filed a response to the Report and Recommendation.
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the files and records in this case. This Court, like Judge Laporte, finds that denial of the application to proceed IFP is appropriate and remand is appropriate for untimely removal and lack of jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, DENIES the application to proceed IFP and REMANDS this case to the Superior Court for Marin County.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
