Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Clayton v. Saul, 2:18-cv-03097-AC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190909641
Filed: Sep. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have an eight (8) day extension of time until September 13, 2019, in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before October 11, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's schedule of administrative hearing and district court bri
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have an eight (8) day extension of time until September 13, 2019, in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before October 11, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's schedule of administrative hearing and district court briefs due (seventeen opening briefs and four reply briefs due). Plaintiff makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant has no objection and has stipulated to the requested relief.

Dated: September 5, 2019. /s/HARVEY P. SACKETT HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff KELLY CLAYTON O/B/O MARKELL MILES Dated: September 5, 2019. /s/MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration [*As authorized by email 9/5/19]

IT IS ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer