Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Best Hires L.L.C. v. GoDaddy Inc., 2:18-cv-00148-JAD-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180226b85 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (First Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1(a), Plaintiff Best Hires L.L.C. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants GoDaddy Inc. and GoDaddy.com, LLC (collectively "GoDaddy"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for GoDaddy to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 6) (the "Motion"). Plaintiff filed the Moti
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

(First Request)

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1(a), Plaintiff Best Hires L.L.C. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants GoDaddy Inc. and GoDaddy.com, LLC (collectively "GoDaddy"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for GoDaddy to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 6) (the "Motion"). Plaintiff filed the Motion on or about February 9, 2018, and served GoDaddy with its Complaint and the Motion on or about February 12, 2018. GoDaddy's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion is presently due on February 26, 2018, and Plaintiff and GoDaddy hereby stipulate and agree to extend this deadline to March 5, 2018. In support of this request, Plaintiff and GoDaddy stipulate as follows:

1. On or about January 26, 2018, Plaintiff filed its Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) and Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Hearing on Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 3).

2. On or about January 29, 2018, the Court issued an Order Denying Motions for Injunctive Relief Without Prejudice (Dkt. No. 5).

3. On or about February 9, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Motion.

4. On or about February 12, 2018, Plaintiff served GoDaddy with its Complaint and the Motion.

5. GoDaddy's Opposition to the Motion is presently due on February 26, 2018.

6. Counsel for GoDaddy and counsel for Plaintiff have been engaged in informal discussions in an attempt to resolve this dispute, and wish to continue those discussions.

7. Plaintiff and GoDaddy have agreed to extend the deadline for GoDaddy to respond to the Motion to March 5, 2018.

8. This stipulation is the parties' first request to extend the deadline for GoDaddy to respond to the Motion.

9. This stipulation is made in good faith, supported by good cause, and is not an attempt to delay any proceedings.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that GoDaddy shall have until March 5, 2018 to respond to the Motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer