CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS LTD. v. SOLID, INC., 5:14-cv-03750-PSG. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150828664
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER (Re: Docket No. 302) PAUL S. GREWAL , Magistrate Judge . Earlier today, the court held a hearing with Plaintiff Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. and Defendants SOLiD, Inc. and Reach Holdings LLC. The hearing addressed a recent declaration from Barry Bruce concerning the accuracy of certain statements and evidence Defendants made and submitted in connection with their motion for summary judgment. Having considered the parties' arguments, the court now rules as follows: •
Summary: ORDER (Re: Docket No. 302) PAUL S. GREWAL , Magistrate Judge . Earlier today, the court held a hearing with Plaintiff Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. and Defendants SOLiD, Inc. and Reach Holdings LLC. The hearing addressed a recent declaration from Barry Bruce concerning the accuracy of certain statements and evidence Defendants made and submitted in connection with their motion for summary judgment. Having considered the parties' arguments, the court now rules as follows: • T..
More
ORDER
(Re: Docket No. 302)
PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.
Earlier today, the court held a hearing with Plaintiff Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. and Defendants SOLiD, Inc. and Reach Holdings LLC. The hearing addressed a recent declaration from Barry Bruce concerning the accuracy of certain statements and evidence Defendants made and submitted in connection with their motion for summary judgment. Having considered the parties' arguments, the court now rules as follows:
• The court DENIES Defendants' motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,969,837.1 In light of the inconsistencies in the record created by the recent Bruce declaration,2 the court is persuaded that triable issues of fact persist as to this discrete issue. An order on the remaining issues presented in the summary judgment motion will follow.
• Defendants shall produce to Corning all documents in Defendants' possession related to the four installations that Defendants identified at today's hearing, namely the projects at the Sioux Falls Convention Center, Reading Hospital, the Minneapolis Convention Center and Kaiser Sunnyside.
FootNotes
1. See Docket No. 258-4.
2. See Docket No. 296-5.
Source: Leagle
