Harlow v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, EDCV 17-02091 JGB (SPx). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190314809
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JESUS G. BERNAL , District Judge . TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Pursuant to the Order filed concurrent herewith, This mater came before the Court on bench trial scheduled for January 23, 2019. Upon reviewing the parties' trial briefs and the administrative record, the Court determined that oral argument was unnecessary for decision, and therefore took the matter under submission on january 17, 2019. In the concurrently filed Order, the Court entered Findings of
Summary: JUDGMENT JESUS G. BERNAL , District Judge . TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Pursuant to the Order filed concurrent herewith, This mater came before the Court on bench trial scheduled for January 23, 2019. Upon reviewing the parties' trial briefs and the administrative record, the Court determined that oral argument was unnecessary for decision, and therefore took the matter under submission on january 17, 2019. In the concurrently filed Order, the Court entered Findings of F..
More
JUDGMENT
JESUS G. BERNAL, District Judge.
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Pursuant to the Order filed concurrent herewith,
This mater came before the Court on bench trial scheduled for January 23, 2019. Upon reviewing the parties' trial briefs and the administrative record, the Court determined that oral argument was unnecessary for decision, and therefore took the matter under submission on january 17, 2019. In the concurrently filed Order, the Court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law under Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, finding that Metropolitan Life Insurance Court determined that oral argument was unnecessary for decision, and therefore disability benefit plan established by her employer Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and that Plaintiff was entitled to have judgment entered in her favor.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. That judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Jennett Harlow in accordance with the concurrently filed Order; and
2. That the action be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Source: Leagle
