FUDGE v. HOBBS, 5:11CV00297 JLH-JJV. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120222925
Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED tha
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Document #8.
2. Fudge's § 2254 Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the requested relief is DENIED. Document #2.
3. All other pending motions are denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
