Tile Tech Inc v Appian Way Sales Inc, 2:17-cv-01660-JLR. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20171213983
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPLAINT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Tile Tech. Inc. filed its Complaint on November 3, 2017. (Dkt. 1). James E. Doroshow, counsel for Defendants Appian Way Sales. Inc. and Puget Lite-Pavers, Inc. ("Defendants"), accepted service on Defendants' behalf on November 10, 2017. (Dkt. 8). On November 20, 2017, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order to extend Defendants' de
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPLAINT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Tile Tech. Inc. filed its Complaint on November 3, 2017. (Dkt. 1). James E. Doroshow, counsel for Defendants Appian Way Sales. Inc. and Puget Lite-Pavers, Inc. ("Defendants"), accepted service on Defendants' behalf on November 10, 2017. (Dkt. 8). On November 20, 2017, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order to extend Defendants' dea..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff Tile Tech. Inc. filed its Complaint on November 3, 2017. (Dkt. 1). James E. Doroshow, counsel for Defendants Appian Way Sales. Inc. and Puget Lite-Pavers, Inc. ("Defendants"), accepted service on Defendants' behalf on November 10, 2017. (Dkt. 8). On November 20, 2017, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order to extend Defendants' deadline to answer, or otherwise move the court for relief, from December 1, 2017 to December 7, 2017. (Dkt. 9). The Court granted the requested extension on November 21, 2017. (Dkt. 10).
The parties hereby request an additional extension of time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move the Court for relief. Defendants have indicated a preliminary desire to file a Rule 12 motion to dismiss in response to the Complaint, and the parties are currently engaged in discussions regarding the issues raised by Defendants. Thus, subject to this Court's approval, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to the following extension of time:
From To
Defendants' deadline to answer, or December 7, 2017 December 18, 2017
otherwise move the Court for relief, on or
before:
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
