Filed: Aug. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . This action was filed on July 17, 2015. All claims have now been resolved or dismissed against all parties, as follows: The following Defendants were dismissed pursuant to notice or stipulation: Defendant Joseph Tannenhill was dismissed on August 20, 2015 (Docket No. 26); Defendant Jose Hernandez was dismissed on October 12, 2015 (Docket No. 65); Defendants James Caspari, DTLA Patrol, and Castoli Patrol and Investigations
Summary: JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . This action was filed on July 17, 2015. All claims have now been resolved or dismissed against all parties, as follows: The following Defendants were dismissed pursuant to notice or stipulation: Defendant Joseph Tannenhill was dismissed on August 20, 2015 (Docket No. 26); Defendant Jose Hernandez was dismissed on October 12, 2015 (Docket No. 65); Defendants James Caspari, DTLA Patrol, and Castoli Patrol and Investigations ..
More
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
This action was filed on July 17, 2015. All claims have now been resolved or dismissed against all parties, as follows:
The following Defendants were dismissed pursuant to notice or stipulation: Defendant Joseph Tannenhill was dismissed on August 20, 2015 (Docket No. 26); Defendant Jose Hernandez was dismissed on October 12, 2015 (Docket No. 65); Defendants James Caspari, DTLA Patrol, and Castoli Patrol and Investigations were dismissed on February 11, 2016 (Docket No. 74); Defendant Zachary Bonn was dismissed on February 25, 2016 (Docket No. 75); Defendant Quentin Price was dismissed on March 14, 2016 (Docket No. 77); Defendant Francisco Gonzalez was dismissed on March 22, 2016 (Docket No. 79); Defendant Lorenzo Sanchez was dismissed on March 31, 2016 (Docket No. 82); Defendant Miguel Mendoza was dismissed on April 19, 2016 (Docket No. 88); Defendant Tyler Pedigo was dismissed on September 30, 2016 (Docket No. 108); and Defendant Mher Uzunyan was dismissed on July 31, 2017 (Docket No. 141).
The following Defendants were never served with process, and therefore the claims against them are dismissed: Defendant Innovative Protection; Defendant Richard Balint; and Defendant Luis Ramirez.
Following a trial to the Court, the Court entered its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to Defendant Yovan Garcia. (Docket No. 132). Consistent with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and pursuant to Rules 54(a) and 58(b)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment on the merits be entered as follows:
1. On Plaintiff's Claim for violation of the Computer Fraud Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(4): The Court enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff Tyan, Inc. and against Defendant Yovan Garcia, in the amount set forth below.
2. On Plaintiff's Claim for violation of the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2701(a): The Court enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff Tyan, Inc. and against Defendant Yovan Garcia, in the amount set forth below.
3. On Plaintiff's Claim for violation of the California Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, California Penal Code section 502: The Court enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff Tyan, Inc. and against Defendant Yovan Garcia, in the amount set forth below.
4. On Plaintiff's Claim for violation of the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act, California Civil Code section 3426: The Court enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff Tyan, Inc. and against Defendant Yovan Garcia, in the amount set forth below.
5. On Plaintiff's Claim for civil conspiracy: The Court enters judgment in favor of Defendant Yovan Garcia, and Plaintiff shall take nothing on this claim.
6. The total judgment entered against Defendant Yovan Garcia for all of the claims is $318,661.70.
Plaintiff is awarded its costs against Defendant Yovan Garcia as provided by law.
