PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. v. JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., C 13-04510 SBA (EDL). (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140529d04
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 28, 2014
Latest Update: May 28, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and defendant and counterclaim-plaintiff Juniper Networks, Inc. hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims and counterclaims between them in this action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (c), with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. [PROPOSED] ORD
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and defendant and counterclaim-plaintiff Juniper Networks, Inc. hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims and counterclaims between them in this action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (c), with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. [PROPOSED] ORDE..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and defendant and counterclaim-plaintiff Juniper Networks, Inc. hereby stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims and counterclaims between them in this action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (c), with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
