Vista Clinical Diagnostics, LLC v. Markovic, 6:17-cv-1491-Orl-41TBS. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190328a87
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's First Amended Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Doc. 88), Plaintiff's Revised Proposed Bill of Costs (Doc. 94), and two Report and Recommendations (Doc. Nos. 92, 98) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on the motions. After a de novo review, and noting that no objections to the Report and Recommendations were timely filed, the Court agrees with the analyses therein. Acco
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's First Amended Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Doc. 88), Plaintiff's Revised Proposed Bill of Costs (Doc. 94), and two Report and Recommendations (Doc. Nos. 92, 98) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on the motions. After a de novo review, and noting that no objections to the Report and Recommendations were timely filed, the Court agrees with the analyses therein. Accor..
More
ORDER
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's First Amended Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Doc. 88), Plaintiff's Revised Proposed Bill of Costs (Doc. 94), and two Report and Recommendations (Doc. Nos. 92, 98) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on the motions.
After a de novo review, and noting that no objections to the Report and Recommendations were timely filed, the Court agrees with the analyses therein. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendations (Doc. Nos. 92, 98) are ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. Plaintiff's First Amended Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Doc. 88) is DENIED.
3. Plaintiffs' Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Doc. 86) is DENIED as moot.
4. The Motion for Clarification (Doc. 99) is DENIED.
5. The Clerk is directed to enter a cost judgment in the amount of $8,014.50 in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
