Comminey v. Qualserv Solutions LLC, 2:19-cv-00508-JAD-NJK (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190805a84
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2019
Summary: Order [Docket Nos. 46, 47] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed a proof of service for a deposition subpoena. Docket No. 46. Defendant Qualserv filed a demand for prior discovery. Docket No. 47. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above-referenced documents, and instructs the parties to refrain f
Summary: Order [Docket Nos. 46, 47] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed a proof of service for a deposition subpoena. Docket No. 46. Defendant Qualserv filed a demand for prior discovery. Docket No. 47. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above-referenced documents, and instructs the parties to refrain fr..
More
Order
[Docket Nos. 46, 47]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff filed a proof of service for a deposition subpoena. Docket No. 46. Defendant Qualserv filed a demand for prior discovery. Docket No. 47. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above-referenced documents, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
