Filed: Sep. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LINKEDIN CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WHEREAS, Plaintiff hiQ Labs, Inc. ("hiQ") filed the complaint in this action against Defendant LinkedIn Corporation ("LinkedIn") on June 7, 2017 (ECF No. 1) and served LinkedIn on June 8, 2017 (ECF No. 22); WHEREAS, on June 27, 2017, pursuant to stipulation, the Court exten
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LINKEDIN CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WHEREAS, Plaintiff hiQ Labs, Inc. ("hiQ") filed the complaint in this action against Defendant LinkedIn Corporation ("LinkedIn") on June 7, 2017 (ECF No. 1) and served LinkedIn on June 8, 2017 (ECF No. 22); WHEREAS, on June 27, 2017, pursuant to stipulation, the Court extend..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LINKEDIN CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
EDWARD M. CHEN, Magistrate Judge.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
WHEREAS, Plaintiff hiQ Labs, Inc. ("hiQ") filed the complaint in this action against Defendant LinkedIn Corporation ("LinkedIn") on June 7, 2017 (ECF No. 1) and served LinkedIn on June 8, 2017 (ECF No. 22);
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2017, pursuant to stipulation, the Court extended LinkedIn's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint to and including July 31, 2017 (ECF No. 32);
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2017, pursuant to stipulation, the Court extended LinkedIn's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint to and including 30 days after resolving hiQ's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 54);
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2017, the Court granted hiQ's motion for a preliminary injunction;
WHEREAS, on September 11, 2017, hiQ informed LinkedIn that attorneys from the law firm of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP will be joining the case and representing hiQ as co-counsel with its current attorneys;
WHEREAS, on September 12, 2017, hiQ informed LinkedIn that it intends to file an amended complaint asserting new causes of action;
WHEREAS, LinkedIn's current deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is September 13, 2017;
WHEREAS, further extending LinkedIn's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until after hiQ files its amended complaint will conserve judicial resources and the resources of the parties;
THEREFORE, for good cause, LinkedIn and hiQ hereby stipulate as follows:
1. hiQ shall file its amended complaint by October 11, 2017.
2. LinkedIn's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to hiQ's amended complaint is extended to and including thirty (30) days from the date that hiQ files its amended complaint.
3. Should LinkedIn move to dismiss the amended complaint, hiQ may opt to amend its complaint, i.e. this stipulation is without prejudice to hiQ's right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 to amend as of right.
4. This stipulation is made without prejudice to the ability of the parties to enter into further agreements or to either side's ability to apply to the Court for any relief that may be appropriate, including a further extension of time.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1 Attestation
I, Jonathan H. Blavin, am the ECF user whose credentials were utilized in the electronic filing of this document. In accordance with N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Deepak Gupta concurred in the filing of this document.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
