Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 07-5944 SC (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141009906 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TO OCCUR AFTER SEPTEMBER 5, 2014 SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. Defendant Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. ("SDI Tianjin") and Plaintiffs Interbond Corp., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corp., ABC Appliance Inc., Marta Cooperative of America, Inc., CompuCom Systems, Inc., Electrograph Systems Inc. and Electrograph Tech. Corp., Schultze Agency Services, LLC on behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC and Tweeter Newco, LLC, and Office Depot (collectivel
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TO OCCUR AFTER SEPTEMBER 5, 2014

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

Defendant Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. ("SDI Tianjin") and Plaintiffs Interbond Corp., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corp., ABC Appliance Inc., Marta Cooperative of America, Inc., CompuCom Systems, Inc., Electrograph Systems Inc. and Electrograph Tech. Corp., Schultze Agency Services, LLC on behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC and Tweeter Newco, LLC, and Office Depot (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have conferred by and through their counsel and, subject to the Court's approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, September 5, 2014 was the deadline to complete fact discovery in the above-captioned actions;

WHEREAS, on August 1, 2014, SDI Tianjin served its First Set of Interrogatories ("SDI Tianjin's Interrogatories") on each of the Plaintiffs;

WHEREAS, on September 5, 2014, Plaintiffs served objections and responses to SDI Tianjin's Interrogatories; and

WHEREAS, SDI Tianjin and Plaintiffs have conferred in good faith and agreed that Plaintiffs will serve supplemental objections and responses to SDI Tianjin Interrogatory Nos. 6 and 8 regarding the specific Samsung entities from whom each Plaintiff purchased CRT Products no later than September 26, 2014;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between counsel for the undersigned parties as follows:

1. Plaintiffs will serve supplemental objections and responses to SDI Tianjin Interrogatory Nos. 6 and 8 no later than September 26, 2014; and

2. To the extent SDI Tianjin wishes to file a motion to compel with respect to item 1 above, it will do so no later than October 3, 2014.

The undersigned parties respectfully request that this stipulation be entered as an Order of the Court.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer