Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. EZViz Inc., 2:19-cv-8629-JAK-AFM. (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200204900
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2020
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 21) JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), recognizing the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. and Defendant EZViz Inc. (the "Stipulation"), the Court finds good cause to GRANT the Stipulation as follows: 1. that the claims asserted herein by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. against Defendant EZViz Inc. be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice;
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 21) JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), recognizing the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. and Defendant EZViz Inc. (the "Stipulation"), the Court finds good cause to GRANT the Stipulation as follows: 1. that the claims asserted herein by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. against Defendant EZViz Inc. be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice; ..
More
ORDER RE STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 21)
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), recognizing the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. and Defendant EZViz Inc. (the "Stipulation"), the Court finds good cause to GRANT the Stipulation as follows:
1. that the claims asserted herein by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. against Defendant EZViz Inc. be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice;
2. that the counterclaims and defenses asserted herein by Defendant EZViz Inc. against Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice; and
3. that the parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
