Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

URBINA-ROJAS v. U.S., 1:16-cv-00518-DAD-SAB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160523629 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 19, 2016
Latest Update: May 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM (Doc. No. 5) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On March 21, 2016, plaintiff Kariuna Urbina-Rojas, a minor by and through her guardian ad litem Domitila Rojas, filed a petition for the appointment of a guardian ad litem. (Doc. No. 5.) "District courts have a special duty, derived from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c), to safeguard the interests of litigants who are minors." Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177 , 1181 (9th Cir. 2011). Rule 1
More

ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM

(Doc. No. 5)

On March 21, 2016, plaintiff Kariuna Urbina-Rojas, a minor by and through her guardian ad litem Domitila Rojas, filed a petition for the appointment of a guardian ad litem. (Doc. No. 5.)

"District courts have a special duty, derived from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c), to safeguard the interests of litigants who are minors." Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2011). Rule 17 provides that "[t]he court must appoint a guardian ad litem—or issue another appropriate order—to protect a minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in an action." Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). Local Rule 202(a) of this court further states, in pertinent part:

Upon commencement of an action or upon initial appearance in defense of an action by or on behalf of a minor . . . the attorney representing the minor or incompetent person shall present . . . a motion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem by the Court, or . . . a showing satisfactory to the Court that no such appointment is necessary to ensure adequate representation of the minor or incompetent person. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c).

The decision to appoint a guardian ad litem "must normally be left to the sound discretion of the trial court." United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F.2d 796, 804 (9th Cir. 1986).

Petitioner Domitila Rojas petitions the court to appoint her as guardian ad litem to her minor child, plaintiff Karina Urbina-Rojas. Plaintiff Urbina-Rojas is a minor, born October 29, 2013. Petitioner states that she is the mother to plaintiff Urbina-Rojas, and that she is competent and qualified to represent and has no interests adverse to plaintiff Urbina-Rojas. Finding good cause, the court grants the petition (Doc. No. 5) and appoints Domitila Rojas guardian ad litem of Kariuna Urbina-Rojas, a minor and plaintiff to this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer