Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ford Motor Company v. Navex Trading Company, Inc., 2:17-2481 WBS CMK. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180323a71 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2018
Summary: STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . After reviewing the parties' Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for March 26, 2018, and makes the following findings and orders without needing to consult with the parties any further. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS The named defendant has been served. No further service will be permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of
More

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

After reviewing the parties' Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for March 26, 2018, and makes the following findings and orders without needing to consult with the parties any further.

I. SERVICE OF PROCESS

The named defendant has been served. No further service will be permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).

II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS

Both parties submit that, following initial discovery, it may be necessary to add additional parties, including any potential purchasers or others involved in the sale of the car at issue. After that, no further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings will be permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).

Plaintiff agrees to strike its claim for injunctive relief if defendant is able to prove that it is no longer necessary.

III. JURISDICTION/VENUE

Jurisdiction is predicated upon diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), because the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states. Venue is undisputed and hereby found to be proper.

IV. DISCOVERY

The parties agree to serve the initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) by March 28, 2018.

To the extent parties intend to use experts, the parties shall disclose experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than October 26, 2018. With regard to expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before November 23, 2018.

All other discovery, including depositions for preservation of testimony, is left open, save and except that it shall be so conducted as to be completed by December 15, 2018. The word "completed" means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge's calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court and so that such motions may be heard (and any resulting orders obeyed) not later than December 15, 2018.

The parties expect to submit for the court's approval a stipulated protective order regarding the confidentiality and other treatment of materials produced in discovery.

V. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE

All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other emergency applications, shall be filed on or before January 30, 2019. All motions shall be noticed for the next available hearing date. Counsel are cautioned to refer to the local rules regarding the requirements for noticing and opposing such motions on the court's regularly scheduled law and motion calendar.

VI. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The Final Pretrial Conference is set for April 15, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom No. 5. The conference shall be attended by at least one of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties and by any unrepresented parties.

Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. Counsel shall file separate pretrial statements, and are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the contents of and time for filing those statements. In addition to those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with: (1) a plain, concise statement which identifies every non-discovery motion which has been made to the court, and its resolution; (2) a list of the remaining claims as against each defendant; and (3) the estimated number of trial days.

In providing the plain, concise statements of undisputed facts and disputed factual issues contemplated by Local Rule 281(b)(3)-(4), the parties shall emphasize the claims that remain at issue, and any remaining affirmatively pled defenses thereto. If the case is to be tried to a jury, the parties shall also prepare a succinct statement of the case, which is appropriate for the court to read to the jury.

VII. TRIAL SETTING

The jury trial is set for June 18, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate that a jury trial will last three to five days.

VIII. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

A Settlement Conference will be set at the time of the Pretrial Conference. All parties should be prepared to advise the court whether they will stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue thereof.

Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. At least seven calendar days before the Settlement Conference counsel for each party shall submit a confidential Settlement Conference Statement for review by the settlement judge. If the settlement judge is not the trial judge, the Settlement Conference Statements shall not be filed and will not otherwise be disclosed to the trial judge.

IX. MODIFICATIONS TO SCHEDULING ORDER

Any requests to modify the dates or terms of this Scheduling Order, except requests to change the date of the trial, may be heard and decided by the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to change the trial date shall be heard and decided only by the undersigned judge.

X. RELATED CASES

This case is not related to any other cases in this district. However, a case is currently pending in the United States District Court Eastern District of Michigan which was filed by Ford against the original purchaser of the subject vehicle, John Cena. That action is pending as Ford v. Cena, USDC E.D. Mich., 2:17-cv-13876 AJT DRG.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer