Buswell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2:19-cv-00211-RFB-GWF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190307d06
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on that parties' Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 6), filed on March 5, 2019. The proposed protective order is unclear whether the party, who asserts that particular information should be treated as confidential under the protective order, has the burden of proof to establish that the information or document is entitled to such protection. The parties are directed to submit a revised protective order with that
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on that parties' Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 6), filed on March 5, 2019. The proposed protective order is unclear whether the party, who asserts that particular information should be treated as confidential under the protective order, has the burden of proof to establish that the information or document is entitled to such protection. The parties are directed to submit a revised protective order with that c..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on that parties' Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 6), filed on March 5, 2019. The proposed protective order is unclear whether the party, who asserts that particular information should be treated as confidential under the protective order, has the burden of proof to establish that the information or document is entitled to such protection. The parties are directed to submit a revised protective order with that clarification. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 6) is denied, without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
