GRONEMAN v. COLVIN, 2:12-cv-01839-APG-GWF. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150223983
Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2015
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Remanding Case (Dkt. ## 20, 21, 22) ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge. On December 13, 2013, Magistrate Judge Foley entered his Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #20] recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal or Remand [Dkt. #20] be granted. Magistrate Judge Foley further recommended that Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm [Dkt. #21] be denied. The government objected to Magistrate Judge Foley's Report and Recommendation. I have conducted a de
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Remanding Case (Dkt. ## 20, 21, 22) ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge. On December 13, 2013, Magistrate Judge Foley entered his Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #20] recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal or Remand [Dkt. #20] be granted. Magistrate Judge Foley further recommended that Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm [Dkt. #21] be denied. The government objected to Magistrate Judge Foley's Report and Recommendation. I have conducted a de ..
More
Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Remanding Case (Dkt. ## 20, 21, 22)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
On December 13, 2013, Magistrate Judge Foley entered his Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #20] recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal or Remand [Dkt. #20] be granted. Magistrate Judge Foley further recommended that Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm [Dkt. #21] be denied. The government objected to Magistrate Judge Foley's Report and Recommendation. I have conducted a de novo review of the issues set forth in the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2. Magistrate Judge Foley's Report and Recommendation sets forth the proper legal analysis, and the factual bases, for the decision. Rather than repeat them herein, I adopt them as my own. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Foley's Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #22] is ACCEPTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal or Remand [Dkt. #20] is GRANTED, Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm [Dkt. #21] is DENIED, and this case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for the payment of disability benefits to the Plaintiff
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay the filing fees in this matter upon the receipt of the payment of past due benefits.
Source: Leagle
