Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Flores v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2:17-cv-01991-JAD-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180205d87 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES (SECOND REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Robert Flores ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsels of record, Brian D. Nettles, Esq. Christian M. Morris, Esq., and Edward J. Wynder, Esq., of Nettles Law Firm, and Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market #3355 ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, Timothy D. Kuhls, Esq., Esq., of Phillips, Spallas & Angstadt, LLC, hereby stipulate to the
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES (SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff, Robert Flores ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsels of record, Brian D. Nettles, Esq. Christian M. Morris, Esq., and Edward J. Wynder, Esq., of Nettles Law Firm, and Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market #3355 ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, Timothy D. Kuhls, Esq., Esq., of Phillips, Spallas & Angstadt, LLC, hereby stipulate to the extension of all remaining discovery deadlines by sixty (60) days pursuant to LR 26-4.

STIPULATED APPLICATION

WHEREAS, the parties have begun discovery but are seeking in good faith to settle this case while continuing to conduct discovery to complete before trial, the parties request a sixty (60) day extension of certain discovery deadlines as set forth below.

A. DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE

1. The parties participated in the Fed. R. Civ. P 26(f) conference on August 15, 2017. 2. Plaintiff made his pre-discovery disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 26.1(a)(1) on August 28, 2017. Defendant served its pre-discovery disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26.1(a)(1) on September 15, 2017. 3. Defendant propounded written discovery to Plaintiff on September 18, 2017 and Plaintiff responded to Requests for Admissions on October 11, 2017 and Requests for Production of Documents on October 16, 2017 and Interrogatories on October 16, 2017. 4. Plaintiff propounded written discovery to Defendant on November 1, 2017 and Defendant responded to Requests for Admissions on December 4, 2017, Requests for Production of Documents on December 18, 2017 and Interrogatories on December 18, 2017. 5. Defendant has taken the depositions of Cheri Adams and Plaintiff, Robert Flores. 6. Plaintiff has taken the deposition of Defendant's cashier Jonathan Sorola.

B. SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED

An Independent Medical Examination of the Plaintiff to be conducted by a retained medical expert from Defendant and initial Expert and Rebuttal disclosures. Additionally, the parties intend to depose several individuals including Defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) designee(s), treating medical professionals, and expert witnesses, other witnesses, if necessary.

C. REASONS FOR EXTENSION TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY

The parties have agreed to participate in a Settlement Conference and the Defendant needs additional time to allow for the scheduling of an Independent Medical Examination of the Plaintiff should settlement negotiations fail. This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

D. PROPOSED NEW DISCOVERY PLAN DEADLINES

Last date to complete discovery: Currently: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 Proposed: Monday, June 11, 2018 Last date to amend pleadings and add parties: Currently: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 Proposed: N/A Last date to disclose experts pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2): Currently: Friday, February 9, 2018 Proposed: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 Last date to disclose rebuttal experts: Currently: Monday, March 12, 2018 Proposed: Friday, May 11, 2018 Last date to file interim status report: Currently: Friday, February 9, 2018 Proposed: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 Last date to file dispositive motions: Currently: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 Proposed: Monday, July 9, 2018 Last date to file joint pretrial order: Currently: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 Proposed: Monday, August 6, 2018

CONCLUSION

Therefore, based upon the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that this Stipulation to Extend Discovery (Second Request) be granted and that the Court adopt the proposed dates mentioned above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer