Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lull v. County of Sacramento, 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170912a84 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2017
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . WHEREAS on July 25, 2017, Judge Kimberly J. Mueller issued her Order [Doc. 31] on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss; WHEREAS in said Order, Judge Mueller granted Plaintiffs fourteen (14) days from the date of the Order, July 25, 2017, or to and until August 8, 2017, to file an amended complaint; WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to an extension of time
More

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

WHEREAS on July 25, 2017, Judge Kimberly J. Mueller issued her Order [Doc. 31] on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss;

WHEREAS in said Order, Judge Mueller granted Plaintiffs fourteen (14) days from the date of the Order, July 25, 2017, or to and until August 8, 2017, to file an amended complaint;

WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to an extension of time for Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint [Doc. 32];

WHEREAS, Judge Mueller granted Plaintiffs' request for additional time, to and until September 1, 2017, to file an amended complaint based upon the parties' previous stipulation [Doc. 33];

WHEREAS Plaintiffs desire additional time, to and until September 8, 2017, to file an amended complaint;

WHEREAS Defendants agree to allow Plaintiffs this additional time to amend;

WHEREAS the County Defendants and Plaintiffs wish to delay service of their initial disclosures until after the pleadings have settled, and Defendant SMUD has already served its initial disclosures and does not object to this agreement between the County Defendants and Plaintiffs;

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, by and through their counsel of record, to the following:

1. Plaintiffs' time to file their Second Amended Complaint is extended to September 8, 2017;

2. Defendants shall have until September 22, 2017, in which to respond to the Second Amended Complaint in any manner permitted under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and

3. The County Defendants and Plaintiffs shall have until two weeks after the County Defendants answer the complaint in which to serve initial disclosures.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

After considering the Stipulation by and between the parties through their counsel of record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is now due no later than September 8, 2017;

2. Defendants have until September 22, 2017, to respond to the Second Amended Complaint in any manner permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

3. Plaintiffs' and the County Defendants' initial disclosures shall be served within fourteen days after the County Defendants file an answer to the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer