ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

This miscellaneous action was commenced on November 13, 2013. (ECF No. 1.) On February 19, 2014, based on an application filed by plaintiff Bond Safeguard Insurance Company, the court issued an order to show cause why contempt citations should not be issued and monetary sanctions imposed against third party witnesses Deborah Sweeney and Molly Floto, as well as their attorney Brian Barrad, based on their alleged failure to comply with plaintiff's subpoenas and this court's December 6, 2013 order directing compliance with those subpoenas. (ECF Nos. 6, 9, 11.)1 The court ordered Deborah Sweeney, Molly Floto, and their attorney to file a written response to the order to show cause no later than March 3, 2014, set a hearing on the matter for March 13, 2014, and directed Deborah Sweeney, Molly Floto, and all counsel to personally appear at the hearing. (ECF No. 11.)2

On March 3, 2014, the third party witnesses and their attorney, Mr. Barrad, filed a timely response to the order to show cause. (ECF No. 12.) On March 6, 2014, plaintiff then filed a reply to the third party witnesses' response to the order to show cause. (ECF No. 14.) At the March 13, 2014 hearing, Richard Sullivan appeared on behalf of plaintiff, and Brian Barrad appeared on behalf of third party witnesses Deborah Sweeney and Molly Floto. Deborah Sweeney was personally present at the hearing, and Molly Floto appeared telephonically. (ECF No. 16.)

Deborah Sweeney confirmed that she was George Kramer's sister, and Molly Floto confirmed that she was Deborah Sweeney's daughter and that George Kramer was her uncle. Upon questioning by the court, both witnesses represented, inter alia, that they did not know where George Kramer was located, did not have any contact information for him personally, and had no contact with him, except when they last saw him at a Thanksgiving 2013 celebration at another relative's house. Deborah Sweeney also indicated that George Kramer might have called her on her cell phone sometime around Thanksgiving 2013, but that she did not have his phone number. However, she stated that she did have a contact number for George Kramer's ex-wife, Patricia, who may or may not know how to reach George Kramer. Both Deborah Sweeney and Molly Floto represented that they had no written documents, e-mails, or text messages for the past 6 ½ years that would be responsive to the subpoenas.

As stated at the hearing, the court orders third party witnesses Deborah Sweeney and Molly Floto to serve on plaintiff, within ten (10) days of this order, declarations under penalty of perjury stating that: (1) they have made a reasonable and diligent search for any documents or electronically stored information responsive to the subpoenas; (2) they have no responsive documents or electronically stored information in their possession, custody, or control; and (3) they affirm the truthfulness and accuracy of all statements made on the record at the March 13, 2014 hearing.3 As part of her declaration, Deborah Sweeney shall also provide the phone number for George Kramer's ex-wife, Patricia, as well as any other contact information (such as physical address or e-mail address) that she may have for Patricia.

After the hearing, plaintiff submitted a supplemental filing requesting the court to order Deborah Sweeney to produce her cell phone records for the period of November-December 2013 in light of her testimony that she received a call from George Kramer around that time. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff's counsel failed to raise this issue at the hearing and Deborah Sweeney has not had an opportunity to respond. As such, the court denies plaintiff's request to have the actual records produced. Instead, the court orders Deborah Sweeney to perform an additional search of her phone records for November-December 2013, and provide, as part of her declaration, the number from which George Kramer purportedly called her during November-December 2013. If Deborah Sweeney is unable to locate, identify, and/or provide that number, she shall set forth the specific reasons and circumstances in her declaration.4

Finally, the court declines to impose any sanctions on Deborah Sweeney, Molly Floto, or Brian Barrad. The court is sympathetic to plaintiff's frustration, especially given the long delays and significant efforts undertaken by plaintiff to obtain responses to the subpoenas. However, the delays were in large part the result of the third party witnesses' reliance on advice of attorney Austin Cooper, who has since been ordered inactive and no longer eligible to practice law by the California State Bar. The court does not presently find that Mr. Barrad continued with Mr. Cooper's course of conduct or that the third party witnesses are unwilling to comply with the subpoenas or the court's orders.

However, Deborah Sweeney, Molly Floto, and their counsel are hereby cautioned that if they fail to comply with the express terms, as well as the spirit, of this order (for example, by filing intentionally evasive declarations), the court will not hesitate to revisit the issue of sanctions. Mr. Barrad is reminded of his obligation as counsel of record to ensure that appropriate searches are conducted and that the ordered information is promptly provided.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

IT IS SO ORDERED.