LOPEZ v. SCHWARZENEGGER, 2:09-cv-1760 MCE AC P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140929582
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel under 42 U.S.C. 1983. By Order filed on January 9, 2014, the then-pending dispositive motion deadline was vacated pending resolution of the motion to consolidate the instant action with Lopez v. Cook, et al., No. 2:03-cv-1605 KJM DAD P. ECF No. 198. The motion to consolidate was denied. ECF No. 202. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The dispositive motion deadline is hereby re-set for Novembe
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel under 42 U.S.C. 1983. By Order filed on January 9, 2014, the then-pending dispositive motion deadline was vacated pending resolution of the motion to consolidate the instant action with Lopez v. Cook, et al., No. 2:03-cv-1605 KJM DAD P. ECF No. 198. The motion to consolidate was denied. ECF No. 202. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The dispositive motion deadline is hereby re-set for November..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Order filed on January 9, 2014, the then-pending dispositive motion deadline was vacated pending resolution of the motion to consolidate the instant action with Lopez v. Cook, et al., No. 2:03-cv-1605 KJM DAD P. ECF No. 198. The motion to consolidate was denied. ECF No. 202.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The dispositive motion deadline is hereby re-set for November 6, 2014; any such motion shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230; and
2. Given the age of this case, any requests for extension of time will be disfavored.
Source: Leagle
