Perry v. Fox, 2:18-cv-0718-MCE-EFB P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191016a34
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 24, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the find
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 24, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findi..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 24, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Despite an extension of time granted to petitioner, neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 24, 2019, are adopted in full;
2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied;
3. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and
4. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
