BATTS v. BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, 3:13-cv-04394 SI. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140926883
Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2014
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT'S REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND ADR VIA TELEPHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE [ADR Local Rules 5-10(d) and 6-10(d)] MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge. Having considered Defendant's letter requesting that its company representative be permitted to attend the court-mandated hybrid ENE/mediation session via telephone or videoconference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's request is GRANTED. Pursuant to ADR Local Rules 5-10(d) and 6-10(d), Defendant's company represen
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT'S REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND ADR VIA TELEPHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE [ADR Local Rules 5-10(d) and 6-10(d)] MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge. Having considered Defendant's letter requesting that its company representative be permitted to attend the court-mandated hybrid ENE/mediation session via telephone or videoconference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's request is GRANTED. Pursuant to ADR Local Rules 5-10(d) and 6-10(d), Defendant's company represent..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT'S REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND ADR VIA TELEPHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE
[ADR Local Rules 5-10(d) and 6-10(d)]
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.
Having considered Defendant's letter requesting that its company representative be permitted to attend the court-mandated hybrid ENE/mediation session via telephone or videoconference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's request is GRANTED. Pursuant to ADR Local Rules 5-10(d) and 6-10(d), Defendant's company representative may attend the hybrid ENE/mediation session via telephone or videoconference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
