Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation, 3:12-cv-06467-MMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140804841
Filed: Aug. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2014
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") and Defendant Mentor Graphics Corp. ("Mentor Graphics") as follows: WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 provides that the Parties may stipulate to extend discovery; WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29(b) provides that Court approval is required to extend discovery, ev
More

SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") and Defendant Mentor Graphics Corp. ("Mentor Graphics") as follows:

WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 provides that the Parties may stipulate to extend discovery;

WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29(b) provides that Court approval is required to extend discovery, even where the Parties have stipulated to the extension;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3 the last day to file a motion to compel discovery is July 25, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Parties filed a stipulation (Dkt. No. 208) and the Court Ordered an extension of the deadlines on which to file a motion to compel discovery to August 1 (Dkt. No. 211);

WHEREAS, the Parties still are continuing to discuss issues and believe there are some disputes that may be resolved through further supplementation and/or cooperation;

WHEREAS, good cause exists for allowing the Parties to extend the deadline on which to file a motion to compel discovery for these issues;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the Parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline on which to file a motion to compel discovery to August 5, 2014, as to the following discovery disputes:

1. Mentor's responses to Synopsys' Requests For Admission Nos. 49, 53, 60, 71, 72, and 94-118; 2. Mentor's responses to Synopsys' Interrogatory Nos. 15, 24, 31, and 36; 3. Synopsys' responses to Mentor's Requests For Admission Nos. 27, 33-36, 45-58, 62-65, 70-72, 75-76, 87-88, 92, 101-02, and 104-05; 4. Mentor's challenges to certain of Synopsys' documents designated "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only," detailed in counsel for Mentor's July 15, 2014 letter to counsel for Synopsys; 5. Mentor's request for the deposition of Kevin Kranen; 6. The parties' follow-up requests as to various documents and information requested to be produced related to alleged "damages" issues, per the parties' correspondence from July 16-18, 2014; and 7. Mentor's follow-up request to produce document retention/destruction policies, pursuant to the July 25, 2014 deposition of Brent Gregory.

AND, the Parties further stipulate to extend the deadline on which to file a motion to compel discovery to August 8, 2014, as to the following discovery disputes:

1. Mentor's challenges to Synopsys' privilege log, detailed in counsel for Mentor's July 18, 2014 letter to counsel for Synopsys.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory above.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer