Filed: Oct. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2012
Summary: [PROPOSED] CIVIL JUDGMENT MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. Defendants having moved to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint, and the Court, on July 31, 2012, having issued an Order Granting Defendants' Motions To Dismiss; Denying Nominal Defendant American Apparel's Motion To Stay [Doc. 63, Filed 7/31/12] (the "Order"), which Order permitted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint by August 30, 2012, and plaintiffs, having declined to file an amended complaint and moving for entry of final
Summary: [PROPOSED] CIVIL JUDGMENT MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. Defendants having moved to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint, and the Court, on July 31, 2012, having issued an Order Granting Defendants' Motions To Dismiss; Denying Nominal Defendant American Apparel's Motion To Stay [Doc. 63, Filed 7/31/12] (the "Order"), which Order permitted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint by August 30, 2012, and plaintiffs, having declined to file an amended complaint and moving for entry of final ..
More
[PROPOSED] CIVIL JUDGMENT
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
Defendants having moved to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint, and the Court, on July 31, 2012, having issued an Order Granting Defendants' Motions To Dismiss; Denying Nominal Defendant American Apparel's Motion To Stay [Doc. 63, Filed 7/31/12] (the "Order"), which Order permitted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint by August 30, 2012, and plaintiffs, having declined to file an amended complaint and moving for entry of final judgment on August 29, 2012, from which to appeal the Order, it is hereby,
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order, with no amended complaint having been filed, the motion to dismiss the consolidated derivative complaint is granted and this action is dismissed.
