Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Thunder Power New Energy Vehicle Development Company Limited v. Byton North America Corporation, 5:18-cv-3115-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180810853 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO BRIEF DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Thunder Power New Energy Vehicle Development Company Limited ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Byton North America Corporation, Byton GmbH, and Nanjing Byton Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Defendants") stipulate to extend the briefing schedule for Defendants Nanjing Byton Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. and Byton GmbH's Motion
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO BRIEF DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Thunder Power New Energy Vehicle Development Company Limited ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Byton North America Corporation, Byton GmbH, and Nanjing Byton Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Defendants") stipulate to extend the briefing schedule for Defendants Nanjing Byton Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. and Byton GmbH's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 28) and Defendant Byton North America Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 29) as follows:

WHEREAS, Defendants filed two motions to dismiss on July 30, 2018;

WHEREAS, consistent with the commentary to Civil L.R. 7-2, the parties met and conferred to consider the appropriateness of "a longer notice period with correspondingly longer periods for response or reply";

WHEREAS, after this meet and confer, the parties agreed that an extended briefing schedule would be appropriate;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the time by which Plaintiff may file oppositions to each of Defendants' motions (Dkt. Nos. 28 & 29) is extended to September 4, 2018;

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the time by which Defendants shall reply to Plaintiff's oppositions to Defendants' motions is extended to September 18, 2018.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), this stipulation is accompanied by the Declaration of Matthew C. Holohan ("Holohan Decl.").

The parties previously stipulated to extend time to respond to the Complaint. Holohan Decl. ¶ 3. The parties previously stipulated to extend the briefing schedule for Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and this stipulation was so ordered by the Court. Id. ¶ 4. The extension requested herein will not otherwise affect the schedule for the case. Id. ¶ 5.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer