Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., 5:13-CV-2416 LHK (PSG). (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141203904 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. WHEREAS Plaintiffs Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. (collectively, "Takeda"), and Defendant Impax Laboratories, Inc., have agreed to terms and conditions for a settlement of this action and have set forth those terms and conditions in a settlement agreement; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

WHEREAS Plaintiffs Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. (collectively, "Takeda"), and Defendant Impax Laboratories, Inc., have agreed to terms and conditions for a settlement of this action and have set forth those terms and conditions in a settlement agreement;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record:

1. This action hereby is voluntarily dismissed in its entirety without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);

2. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement; and

3. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall close the case file.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer