Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TAJMIRI v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, 8:16-cv-00247 JVS.(DFMx) (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160517709 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . On April 27, 2016, this Court granted Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (hereinafter "Chase") and Federal National Mortgage Association's (hereinafter "Fannie Mae") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Shahrzad Tajmiri's (hereinafter "Plaintiff") Complaint with prejudice, which Defendant Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP (hereinafter "Barrett") joined. [Doc. 14.] Defendants Chase, Fannie Mae, and Barrett will be collectively referred to as "De
More

JUDGMENT

On April 27, 2016, this Court granted Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (hereinafter "Chase") and Federal National Mortgage Association's (hereinafter "Fannie Mae") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Shahrzad Tajmiri's (hereinafter "Plaintiff") Complaint with prejudice, which Defendant Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP (hereinafter "Barrett") joined. [Doc. 14.] Defendants Chase, Fannie Mae, and Barrett will be collectively referred to as "Defendants".

Given the foregoing ruling, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action. A final JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL is hereby entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff shall take nothing by way of any claims against Defendants, and Defendants are entitled to recover its costs of suit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer