WHEELER v. HODGES, 2:13-cv-2526 MCE KJN P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150820735
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 6, 2015, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein (ECF No. 32), which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recomm
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 6, 2015, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein (ECF No. 32), which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recomme..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 6, 2015, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein (ECF No. 32), which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 06, 2015 (ECF No. 32) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 30) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
