Planet Aid, Inc. v. Reveal, Center for Investigative Reporting, 17-cv-03695-MMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190128614
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 611(A) Re: Dkt. No. 166 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is plaintiffs Planet Aid, Inc. and Lisbeth Thomsen's "Motion to Exclude Evidence Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a)," filed November 6, 2018. Defendants Reveal, Center for Investigative Reporting, Matt Smith, and Amy Walters have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. The matter came on regularly for he
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 611(A) Re: Dkt. No. 166 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is plaintiffs Planet Aid, Inc. and Lisbeth Thomsen's "Motion to Exclude Evidence Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a)," filed November 6, 2018. Defendants Reveal, Center for Investigative Reporting, Matt Smith, and Amy Walters have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. The matter came on regularly for hea..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 611(A)
Re: Dkt. No. 166
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiffs Planet Aid, Inc. and Lisbeth Thomsen's "Motion to Exclude Evidence Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a)," filed November 6, 2018. Defendants Reveal, Center for Investigative Reporting, Matt Smith, and Amy Walters have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. The matter came on regularly for hearing on January 18, 2019. Ethan Forrest of Covington & Burling LLP appeared on behalf of defendants. Samuel Rosenthal of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP appeared on behalf of plaintiffs.
Having considered the parties' respective written submissions and the arguments of counsel at the hearing, the motion is, for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, hereby DENIED as premature.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
