Davis v. ARS National Services, Inc., 1:19-cv-00885-LJO-SAB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190730980
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ECF No. 7 STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed this action on June 28, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On July 26, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation requesting an extension until August 9, 2019, for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. (ECF No. 7.) Accordingly, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's complai
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ECF No. 7 STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed this action on June 28, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On July 26, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation requesting an extension until August 9, 2019, for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. (ECF No. 7.) Accordingly, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's complain..
More
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
ECF No. 7
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action on June 28, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On July 26, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation requesting an extension until August 9, 2019, for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. (ECF No. 7.)
Accordingly, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's complaint on or before August 9, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
