Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STRUB v. YOUTUBE, LLC, C 13-04704 RS. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140407559 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, on January 23, 2014, this Court entered a Case Management Scheduling Order (Dkt. 46); WHEREAS, on February 4, 2014, Daniel Strub ("Strub") filed a First Amended Complaint which added Google Inc. as a party defendant (Dkt. 47); WHEREAS, on March 19, 2014, defendants YouTube, Inc. and Google Inc. filed an Answer to the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 52); and WHEREAS, the parties are agreeable to adh
More

STIPULATION AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on January 23, 2014, this Court entered a Case Management Scheduling Order (Dkt. 46);

WHEREAS, on February 4, 2014, Daniel Strub ("Strub") filed a First Amended Complaint which added Google Inc. as a party defendant (Dkt. 47);

WHEREAS, on March 19, 2014, defendants YouTube, Inc. and Google Inc. filed an Answer to the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 52); and

WHEREAS, the parties are agreeable to adhering to the deadlines fixed by the Court in the Case Management Scheduling Order;

THEREFORE, subject to the Court's approval, the parties stipulate as follows:

The deadlines set in the Case Management Scheduling Order shall apply to newly added party Google Inc. Discovery shall be limited as follows: (a) ten (10) non-expert depositions per side, limited to seven (7) hours per individual deposition; (b) seven (7) hours of deposition testimony of each adverse expert for each report provided, extended to fourteen (14) hours if any single expert provides a report related to both infringement and validity; (c) twenty-five (25) interrogatories per side, including all discrete subparts; (d) a reasonable number of requests for production of documents or for inspection per side; and (e) thirty (30) requests for admission per side.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer