Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. JOHNSON, 2:10-cv-02203-MMD-GWF. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20130613b54 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2013
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. Before the Court is the Receiver's Emergency Motion Regarding Issue Raised in Motion for Clarification Filed by the Todd Vowell Parties. ( See dkt. no. 1075.) Good cause appearing, the Receiver's Emergency Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Receiver and the FTC have seven (7) days from the date of this Order to file a supplement to the Vowell Parties' Emergency Motion for Clarification of Order. ( See dkt. no. 998.) The supplement is to add
More

ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Receiver's Emergency Motion Regarding Issue Raised in Motion for Clarification Filed by the Todd Vowell Parties. (See dkt. no. 1075.) Good cause appearing, the Receiver's Emergency Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Receiver and the FTC have seven (7) days from the date of this Order to file a supplement to the Vowell Parties' Emergency Motion for Clarification of Order. (See dkt. no. 998.) The supplement is to address the following issues in the context of pertinent receivership law:

1. The use of unsecured credit to pay attorneys' fees in light of the Preliminary Injunction. 2. The due diligence required by counsel in evaluating the source and nature of payments received in circumstances involving an asset freeze and receivership.

The Vowell Entities will have seven (7) days thereafter to file their Response to this supplement. No reply brief is to be filed. All briefs are limited to ten (10) pages in length.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer