Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kizer v. PTP, Inc., 3:15-cv-00120-RCJ-WGC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190325b85 Visitors: 61
Filed: Mar. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO RULE (1)(A)(ii) OF THE FEDERAL. RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Leon Mark Kizer ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Donald L. Damotte, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this Stipulation of Dismissal as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant executed a Settlement Agreement between Plaintiff
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO RULE (1)(A)(ii) OF THE FEDERAL. RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Leon Mark Kizer ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Donald L. Damotte, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this Stipulation of Dismissal as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant executed a Settlement Agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant.

WHEREAS, additional conditions of the Settlement Agreement have been satisfied, and Plaintiff and Defendant now desire to dismiss their claims against each other with prejudice, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant hereby file this Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Each party shall bear its own costs and fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer