Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Plascencia v. Collins Asset Group, LLC, 2:17-cv-01505-MJP. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20181228b03 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT COLLINS ASSET GROUP, LLC'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT MARSHA J. PECHMAN , District Judge . I. STIPULATED MOTION Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), Defendant Collins Asset Group, LLC ("CAG") and Plaintiffs Jaime Plascencia and Cecelia Plascencia jointly request that the Court extend CAG's deadline to respond to the Plascencias' Second Amended Complaint for Violations of 15 USC 1692 and RCW Chapters 19.
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT COLLINS ASSET GROUP, LLC'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

I. STIPULATED MOTION

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), Defendant Collins Asset Group, LLC ("CAG") and Plaintiffs Jaime Plascencia and Cecelia Plascencia jointly request that the Court extend CAG's deadline to respond to the Plascencias' Second Amended Complaint for Violations of 15 USC §1692 and RCW Chapters 19.16 and 19.86 Et Seq. ("Second Amended complaint") to January 4, 2019.

Good cause exists for this extension, as it will allow to CAG to fully investigate and respond to the complex allegations set forth in the Second Amended Complaint. In addition, when the Second Amended Complaint was initially filed, Exhibit F was inadvertently omitted. While the Plascencias have recognized and corrected this error, this did not occur until December 20, 2018, one day before CAG's current deadline to respond.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer