Filed: Feb. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On January 5, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for a court-ordered settlement conference. By order filed February 1, 2012, defendants were directed to respond to plaintiff's motion. On February 8, 2012, defendants filed an opposition to the motion. After review of the record, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 5, 201
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On January 5, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for a court-ordered settlement conference. By order filed February 1, 2012, defendants were directed to respond to plaintiff's motion. On February 8, 2012, defendants filed an opposition to the motion. After review of the record, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 5, 2012..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 5, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for a court-ordered settlement conference. By order filed February 1, 2012, defendants were directed to respond to plaintiff's motion. On February 8, 2012, defendants filed an opposition to the motion.
After review of the record, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 5, 2012 motion for a court-ordered settlement conference (Doc. No. 153) is denied.
