Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Marsh v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, 4:16-cv-05084-KAW. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160929999 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SUBMITTING ENTIRE ACTION TO ARBITRATION AND STAYING PROCEEDING KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff GARY MARSH ("Plaintiff") and FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on July 19, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco; WHEREAS, Defendant removed
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SUBMITTING ENTIRE ACTION TO ARBITRATION AND STAYING PROCEEDING

Plaintiff GARY MARSH ("Plaintiff") and FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on July 19, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco;

WHEREAS, Defendant removed the case to the United States District Court, Northern District of California;

WHEREAS, during his employment with Defendant, Plaintiff entered into an agreement to arbitrate any and all claims arising out of Plaintiff's employment with Defendant, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16), which Defendant contends is valid and binding with respect to Plaintiff's claims in this action (the "Arbitration Agreement");

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that Plaintiff's claims should be submitted to binding arbitration, pursuant to the terms of the Arbitration Agreement;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant filed on July 19, 2016 is deemed as the served Request for Arbitration;

WHEREAS, the parties agree to stay all proceedings in this case until arbitration has been completed; provided however, that this stipulation shall not be construed as a waiver of Defendant's right to seek dismissal of this case upon completion of the binding arbitration.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the Parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, subject to an order of the Court, that:

(1) All of Plaintiff's claims in this case shall be submitted to final and binding arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Agreement;

(2) The Parties agree to meet and confer regarding the selection of a mutually agreeable arbitrator;

(3) This action shall be stayed pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3 pending the completion of binding arbitration;

(4) The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enter orders regarding the arbitrator's award as provided in 9 U.S.C. §§ 9-13; and

(5) Any and all pending deadlines before or with this Court should be taken off calendar.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, STEPHEN NOEL ILG, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer