Vandiver v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00362-JAD-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180717b57
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2018
Summary: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Rosa G. Vandiver (Plaintiff) and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of forty-five (45) days to file her Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The current due date is July 16, 2018. The new date will be August 30, 20
Summary: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Rosa G. Vandiver (Plaintiff) and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of forty-five (45) days to file her Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The current due date is July 16, 2018. The new date will be August 30, 201..
More
DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Rosa G. Vandiver (Plaintiff) and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of forty-five (45) days to file her Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The current due date is July 16, 2018. The new date will be August 30, 2018. An extension of time is needed because the attorney responsible for briefing this case is still recovering from a medical procedure, requiring her to take medical leave, and is now facing a backlog of cases already on extension. This is the first extension of time requested by Defendant in the above. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT:
I, Gina Tomaselli, certify that the following individual(s) were served with a copy of the foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME on the date and via the method of service identified below:
CM/ECF:
Marc V Kalagian
Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP
211 E. Ocean Blvd.
Suite 420
Long Beach, CA 90802
Email: marc.kalagian@rksslaw.com
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Source: Leagle
