Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Taylor, 13-411 MMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161219822 Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Upon consideration of the United States' Application for Writ of Continuing Garnishment and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' Application for Writ of Continuing Garnishment is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue a Writ of Continuing Garnishment to CEX America, Inc., as Garnishee, for the purpose of garnishing p
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT

Upon consideration of the United States' Application for Writ of Continuing Garnishment and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' Application for Writ of Continuing Garnishment is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue a Writ of Continuing Garnishment to CEX America, Inc., as Garnishee, for the purpose of garnishing property (including nonexempt disposable earnings) in which Jess Taylor ("Defendant") has a substantial nonexempt interest, in order to satisfy the judgment entered in the above-captioned case against the Defendant.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to issue the proposed "Clerk's Notice of Post-Judgment Garnishment and Instructions to Defendant" (Dkt. No. 7), and the United States is hereby ORDERED to serve defendant and the garnishee with (1) the writ of garnishment, (2) the "Clerk's Notice of Post-Judgment Garnishment and Instructions to Defendant," and (3) the instructions to the garnishee (Dkt. No. 8). See 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer