Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Castro v. California, 2:18-cv-02115-KJM-EFB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190118723 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . Plaintiffs and Defendants Adolfson and Burton ("the Parties") stipulate and agree that Defendants Adolfson and Burton may have until February 14, 2019, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. This is the second stipulation between the Parties for an extension of time for Defendants Adolfson and Burton to file a responsive ple
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs and Defendants Adolfson and Burton ("the Parties") stipulate and agree that Defendants Adolfson and Burton may have until February 14, 2019, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. This is the second stipulation between the Parties for an extension of time for Defendants Adolfson and Burton to file a responsive pleading.

The Parties agree that the following good cause exists for the extension:

1. Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Complaint on November 2, 2018, against Defendants Adolfson, Seibel, Burton, Kernan, Diaz, and Brown. (ECF No. 11.)

2. Defendants Adolfson and Burton were served on December 6, 2018. (ECF Nos. 15, 16.)

3. Defendants Seibel, Kernan, Diaz, and Brown have not been served.

4. The Parties previously stipulated to extend the time for Defendants Adolfson and Burton to respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint to January 24, 2019. (ECF No. 17.)

5. The Parties telephonically met and conferred on January 15, 2019, to discuss the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint that Defendants Adolfson and Burton intend to file. The Parties agreed that it would be in the interest of judicial economy to extend the deadline for Defendants Adolfson and Burton to respond to the First Amended Complaint to February 14, 2019, to allow sufficient time for the remaining defendants to be served, and avoid the filing of multiple motions to dismiss.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer