Rioux v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00233-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190313819
Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time, from March 11, 2019 to April 10, 2019, to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's first request for an extensio
Summary: STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time, from March 11, 2019 to April 10, 2019, to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's first request for an extension..
More
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time, from March 11, 2019 to April 10, 2019, to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that good cause exists for the requested extension because Defendant's counsel requires additional time to review the record and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, to research the legal issues Plaintiff has raised, to determine whether options exist for settlement, and to prepare Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Motion if settlement is not possible. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's request for an extension of time.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
