Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Perez v. Unified Nutrimeals, CV13-9104 PA(MANx). (2014)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20140909510 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2014
Summary: FIRST AMENDED CONSENT JUDGMENT PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor ("Secretary") and Defendants, Unified Nutrimeals, a California Corporation, Shabir Kashyap, individually and as managing agent of corporate defendant Unified Nutrimeals, Hugo Meza, individually and as managing agent of corporate defendant Unified Nutrimeals, and Philip Chavez, individually and as managing agent of corporate defendant Unified Nutrimeal
More

FIRST AMENDED CONSENT JUDGMENT

PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor ("Secretary") and Defendants, Unified Nutrimeals, a California Corporation, Shabir Kashyap, individually and as managing agent of corporate defendant Unified Nutrimeals, Hugo Meza, individually and as managing agent of corporate defendant Unified Nutrimeals, and Philip Chavez, individually and as managing agent of corporate defendant Unified Nutrimeals (collectively "Defendants"), respectfully request this Court to modify the Consent Judgment that it approved on December 18, 2013 by replacing the Exhibit 2 attached to the December 18, 2013, Consent Judgment with the attached Amended Exhibit 2. The Amended Exhibit 2 reflects the payments that have been made by the Defendants to date and adjusts the payment amounts and due dates of future payments to provide for no payments during the summer months based on Defendants' representations that their cash flow is diminished during July, August and September. While the amount and timing of the payments are adjusted, the total amount of back wages due and the completion of all payments by July 14, 2016, remain as provided under the December 18, 2013, Consent Judgment.

The Court directs the entry of this Modification to the December 18, 2013, Consent Judgment as a final order.

AMENDED EXHIBIT 2

Payment Date Due Gross Interest Total Due No. Due 1 12/14/2013 $4,181.17 $57.49 $4,238.66 Paid 2 01/14/2014 $4,181.17 $57.49 $4,238.66 Paid 3 02/14/2014 $4,181.17 $57.49 $4,238.66 Paid 4 03/14/2014 $4,181.17 $57.49 $4,238.66 Paid 5 04/14/2014 $4,181.17 $57.49 $4,238.66 Paid 6 05/14/2014 $4,181.17 $57.49 $4,238.66 Paid 7 06/14/2014 $4,181.17 $57.49 $4,238.66 Paid 8 07/14/2014 No Payment Due 9 08/14/2014 No Payment Due 10 09/14/2014 No Payment Due 11 10/14/2014 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 12 11/14/2014 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 13 12/14/2014 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 14 01/14/2015 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 15 02/14/2015 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 16 03/14/2015 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 17 04/14/2015 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 18 05/14/2015 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 19 06/14/2015 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 20 07/14/2015 No Payment Due 21 08/14/2015 No Payment Due 22 09/14/2015 No Payment Due 23 10/14/2015 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 24 11/14/2015 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 25 12/14/2015 $5,501.54 $75.64 $5,577.18 26 01/14/2016 $5,501.54 $75.65 $5,577.19 27 02/14/2016 $5,501.54 $75.65 $5,577.19 28 03/14/2016 $5,501.54 $75.65 $5,577.19 29 04/14/2016 $5,501.54 $75.65 $5,577.19 30 05/14/2016 $5,501.54 $75.65 $5,577.19 31 06/14/2016 $5,501.54 $75.65 $5,577.19 32 07/14/2016 $5,501.54 $75.65 $5,577.19 Total $133,797.45 $1,839.67 $135,637.12
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer