Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TSI USA LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 4:17-cv-03536-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190412868 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . WHEREAS, on March 22, 2019, per the Court's instruction, the parties submitted a Joint Status Report On Mediation Session; WHEREAS, following the ADR process, the parties have met and conferred regarding an efficient and logically-sequenced schedule for upcoming case activity; WHEREAS, Plaintiff has indicated that it intends to file a Second Amended Complaint, and Defendant has indica
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, on March 22, 2019, per the Court's instruction, the parties submitted a Joint Status Report On Mediation Session;

WHEREAS, following the ADR process, the parties have met and conferred regarding an efficient and logically-sequenced schedule for upcoming case activity;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has indicated that it intends to file a Second Amended Complaint, and Defendant has indicated that it will likely move to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in whole or in part;

THEREFORE, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, and subject to the Court's approval, stipulate as follows:

Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint on or before April 16, 2019.

Defendant shall file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on or before May 16, 2019. The briefing schedule for the motion shall conform with the requirements in Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3, and the hearing on the motion, if any, shall be noticed in accordance with Judge Gilliam's calendar for civil motions, and relevant scheduling notes.

A Case Management Conference will be scheduled by the Court, subject to the Court's availability, within 30 days following an order on the above-referenced motion to dismiss, or as soon thereafter as the Court's schedule permits.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Brian C. Rocca, the filer of this document, obtained the consent of Mr. Shebar before its filing.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer