Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. EL DORADO COUNTY, 2:01-cv-01520-MCE-DAD. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141030915 Visitors: 31
Filed: Oct. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. Through the present action, the government seeks to recover response costs to remediate pollution discovered at the site of a former landfill dump located on National Forest Service lands near Meyers, California. In August of 2010, the government and Defendant El Dorado County, entered into a Partial Consent Decree designed to consolidate buried waste mass at the landfill. On April 27, 2011, however, the County moved to modify that Decree o
More

ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

Through the present action, the government seeks to recover response costs to remediate pollution discovered at the site of a former landfill dump located on National Forest Service lands near Meyers, California. In August of 2010, the government and Defendant El Dorado County, entered into a Partial Consent Decree designed to consolidate buried waste mass at the landfill. On April 27, 2011, however, the County moved to modify that Decree on grounds that the design drawing and specifications created by the United States Forest Service deviated significantly from actual conditions at the site.

The County's Motion was granted by Memorandum and Order filed July 8, 2011 (ECF No. 416), and this Court ordered that a separate evidentiary hearing be held to determine the government's liability for any additional costs paid by the County, but not reflected by the original specifications, to effectuate the remediation design. In their Joint Status Report filed December 20, 2013, the parties requested that the evidentiary hearing be referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for adjudication. The undersigned issued the requested referral by order filed April 3, 2014, but before the hearing was scheduled the parties entered into a Stipulation, filed September 9, 2014, agreeing that the additional response costs incurred by the County and subject to reimbursement by the government totaled $5,703,003.50. Since that computation of the government's liability for additional costs was the subject of the undersigned's referral to the Magistrate Judge, the Magistrate Judge's task in this matter is now complete.

The parties' most recent Joint Status Report, filed September 9, 2014, indicates that while the amount of additional response costs is now undisputed, the baseline by which the government's net liability to the County is computed remains in dispute. The County maintains that all expenses incurred above and beyond the amount of the construction bids obtained on the basis of the Forest Service's design drawing and specifications ($3,427,745.00) are recoverable, meaning that the government owes the entire $5,703.003.30 in additional costs. The government, on the other hand, contends that the baseline for its liability should be $5,500,000.00, the estimated cost of constructing the Remedial Design as set forth in the Partial Consent Decree executed by the parties and entered by the Court in August of 2010. ECF No. 389. If that baseline is accepted, the government's liability would decrease from $5,703,003.30 to $3,427.745.00.

Not later than November 28, 2014, the County is directed to submit an opening brief, not to exceed fifteen (15) pages, setting forth its proposed resolution as to reimbursement and specifying its view as to the total amount now owed by the government. The government shall then submit its responsive brief, also not to exceed fifteen (15) pages, by January 2, 2015. Any reply on behalf of the County must be filed no later than January 14, 2015 and shall not exceed ten (10) pages in length. Following completion of the briefing above, the Court will determine whether oral argument is indicated and will schedule a hearing as necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer