Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Doolin v. Davis, 1:09-cv-01453-AWI-SAB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180425882
Filed: Apr. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: PETITIONER'S PRO SE SUBMISSION STANLEY A. BOONE , District Judge . Before the Court is Petitioner's pro se submission received by the Court Clerk and filed in the docket on April 16, 2018. (Doc. No. 205.) Therein, Petitioner revisits his previously rejected pro se request for relief. ( See Doc. Nos. 203, 204.) Petitioner is again advised that because he is represented by appointed counsel in this proceeding, the Court will not consider pro se documents about the presentation of h
More

ORDER RE: PETITIONER'S PRO SE SUBMISSION

Before the Court is Petitioner's pro se submission received by the Court Clerk and filed in the docket on April 16, 2018. (Doc. No. 205.) Therein, Petitioner revisits his previously rejected pro se request for relief. (See Doc. Nos. 203, 204.) Petitioner is again advised that because he is represented by appointed counsel in this proceeding, the Court will not consider pro se documents about the presentation of his case that are unrelated to representation by appointed counsel. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 191(c). Additionally, it remains that the Court is without authority to provide the remedy he seeks in state court.

Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to return to Petitioner a copy of the instant pro se submission (Doc. No. 205). Counsel for Petitioner, Robert Bryan and Pamala Sayasane, are directed to provide him with a copy of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer